Studies have shown
that substance abusers are 33% less productive overall (Patrick Dixon). Patrick
Dixon found research showing that “when the State of Ohio introduced random drug
testing they found absenteeism dropped 91%, there were 88% less problems with
supervisors and 97% decrease in on-the-job injuries”. Employers have a
responsibility to ensure that their employees do not pose a safety risk to
anyone while on the job. Unless employees’ belong to a union, they have little
to no legal protection against being drug tested.
State and local
legislature have limited the powers of employers by passing statutes regarding
drug testing. Because of this, many
employers have put contractual agreements into place that effect what rights
the employee has. However, even if an employer is able to obtain information
that an employee is doing drugs, they are still limited as to how they are
allowed to respond to their findings. It is believed that drug testing
interferes with the EAW principle of guaranteed political right, more
specifically, the right to privacy.
I believe that,
because drug use can be such a liability to employers, drug testing should be
allowed under any circumstances. The continued passage of acts that are
limiting actions of employers shows that the majority of American’s would not
agree with my statement.
Moral philosophies
can be consistent with both arguments. An employee privacy is a right that
should be guarded however not doing drugs may potentially affect your work
performance is the ethical thing to do. I
think that this issue is present because we do not want people doing illegal
drugs, however, when figuring out whether or not someone is doing illegal drugs
divulges information about other legal drugs they are taking, privacy is
violated. I don’t think that whether or not you are on depression medication or
ADHD medication etcetera is any of an employer’s business.
Dixon,
Patrick. (Jan. 26, 2011). Drug Testing in the Workplace. Retrieved from http://www.globalchange.com/drugtest.htm
on February 20, 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment