Before the UCC and the
UCCITA, the government enacted the commerce clause. The commerce clause, which
is Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3, of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the
power to regulate commerce between states. The Constitution put limits of state
powers but also recognizes a states inherent right to the regulation of
domestic commerce. “The exercise by Congress of its
regulatory power has increased steadily with the growth and expansion of
industry and means of transportation” (Farlex).
The
Uniform Commercial Code is a set of laws that are used to govern the commercial
transactions that go on in the United States. This code applies to the sale of
goods as well are contracts, leases, and loans. The National Conference of
Commissioners initially created the UCC. Although it is not a federal law, each
of the 50 state’s legislature has either adopted the code verbatim or enacted a
modified version. (U.S. Small Business Administration) The
Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act is more specifically focused on
computer information transactions than the UCC. The major difference between
the UCC and the UCITA is that Article 2 of the UCC only deals with the sale of
goods, and disregards the types of contracts specifically referred to in the UCITA.
The UCC only applies to transactions where the goods are “identifiable and
moveable”(LAWINFO). The UCC also states that it only applies to sales and not
licenses.
Legally,
when you sell a product, the owner is exchanging all rights to the item for
money. When someone is licensing something, they are granting someone
permission to certain rights for a price. When a person is licensing something,
they are still the owner of it. It is the difference between the complete
transfer of rights and the limited transfer of rights. The significant problem
with licensing is that it could replace sales all together, “without provision
for the public policy goals embodied in copyright law”(National Academy Press).
The
NCCUSL decided to propose UCITA as a separate uniform act because when they
tried to add a new article to the UCC, the American Law Institute called for
revisions in it. The NCCUSL did not think that revisions were necessary so they
withdrew from the amendment process and recast it on their own without the ALI.
UCITA is still today opposed by many including the Federal Trade Commission and
the Attorneys General of over 20 states (Huggins). If the NCCUSL wouldn’t have
proposed it be a separate act, they probably would not have been able to get
the amendment added to the UCC because of all of the controversy.
Farlex.
(n.d.). Commerce Clause. Retrieved on March 4, 2011 from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Commerce+Clause.
Huggins,
James S. (n.d.). UCITA: Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act.
Retrieved on March 4, 2011 from http://www.jamesshuggins.com/h/tek1/ucita.htm.
LAWINFO.
(n.d.). What is Article 2 of The U.C.C.?. Retrieved on March 4, 2011 from
http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/UCC-and-Warranties/Federal/what-is-article-2-of-the-ucc.html.
National
Academy Press. (2000). “Licensing” vs. “Buying” Information: Legal and Policy
Implications. Retrieved on March 4, 2011 from
http://www.cni.org/tfms/2001a.spring/handout/Licensing-DArsenault2001Stf.pdf.
No comments:
Post a Comment